11 Aug, 2008
Fiscal Paulista Note: The more you ask, the more you think wins
Posted by: Marcelo Galvani In: General
When did you start this crop of NF Paulista I wrote a post on the subject, and it took me to believe what they said. Well, here replicates the post of Luciana, a good example of how this story Invoice Paulista is not working.
PAULISTA TAX NOTE: The more you ask, the more you think wins
"Now in Sao Paulo is like this: 30% of VAT collected by the shop will be returned to consumers. This will reduce, in fact, the tax burden on individual citizens. The government of São Paulo state imposed the law that created the Program Fiscal stimulus for Citizenship and implemented the project to Notes fiscal Paulista from 1st October 2007. The project to Notes fiscal Paulista return money to consumers. He is an incentive for people who buy goods require establishment of the commercial paper tax. Consumers identified by the SFC or CNPJ at the time of purchase will receive credits and still go to qualify to compete for prizes. The goal is to encourage people in the habit of demanding the note or the tax bill. "
That is what is on the site.My parents have applied for with the SFC chit in the hope ganahrem the promised credits, even in nominal values. However, it is an enticement: in the 2nd half of 2007, my mother had several notes registered in their CPF, and spending of $ 741.30, the return was fucking U.S. $ 3.15, for only 2 establishments registered the note and the value was computed (a note of $ 262 and a U.S. $ 97.50. The rest was from outside). This without counting on a note of $ 632.00 - Rubayat issued by, say, the movement - nor was recorded! And the worst thing is that if the note was not registered, you can not complain (only if the note was recorded at least). I tried, but failed. And is the "lack of record" when it tries to fill the message objection. If anyone knows how, let me know.
As for the 2nd half, there was the purchase of a TV in value of $ 6999.00 in Fast Shop. The note was recorded, but the claim was released? NO! Do I have time to complain? Nor, because the term is super short. And even if this ... Who responds? Nobody, because I sent messages on other notes that simply did not generate credit and there was no response.
And a note of the Walmart of 21/04/08, of $ 280.00, which is that the value was calculated, but the credit is zero. How so?
And my father, who only in the 2nd half of 2008, had spent U.S. $ 5700.00 and ZERO credit? Of course it has passed the deadline for claims and almost all notes ...
I think we have made fools of paper, the pq then, I do not know if it's just lack of allocation of credit to us, or whether the sites nor collect the tax ...
For the government that matters is that the NC is issued, what has happened.
The establishment, in turn, is not charged (and perhaps not be obliged) to, after issuing the NF, into a site and inform our CPF.
Worse, they can come and inform any CPF, even one of the partners or relatives.
The problem has worsened in June (if I am not mistaken) with the news that the credit will be divided among the only people who ask NC.
Thus, before we "receberíamos" a portion of VAT collected on our consumption. Now receive a portion of the entire VAT collected by the establishment, proportionate only to those who informed the SFC.
That is, if the establishment inform the SFC of only a NC, that will receive full credit for all NFS issued for him.
And the government is concerned? Of course not! Part of it is guaranteed ...
Recent Comments